The aim of this manual is to provide students the transversal skills of a Philology student: writing, computer sciences and information. This objective was obtained in the Project of Innovation and Improvement of Teaching Quality (PIMCD
279/2007) funded by the Vicerrectorado de Desarrollo y Calidad de la
Docencia.
Este manual que te presentamos cumple con uno de los objetivos
prioritarios de la Facultad de Filología: facilitar, a los que iniciáis estudios en
nuestra Facultad, el desarrollo de las destrezas transversales básicas para el
estudiante de Filología: escriturales, informáticas, informacionales. Este
objetivo se planteó y puso en marcha, hace un año, en el marco de un
Proyecto de Innovación y Mejora de la Calidad de la Docencia (PIMCD
279/2007) financiado por el Vicerrectorado de Desarrollo y Calidad de la
Docencia.
This paper explores the process of discovering works of elit by focusing on the role of the online literary journal. The heyday of Web 1.0, the late 1990s, gave birth to the first generation of electronic literature. To support this emergent art form, this period also delivered a multitude of online literary journals that showcased hypertexts, kinetic poetry, animations, and interactive fiction as well as scholarly articles, interviews with authors, book reviews, and critical discourse. But as the Web became a more graphic-friendly navigation space and debates about cybertext vs. hypertext took centerstage in critical forums, celebration of electronic literature in web-zines and journals seemed to dry up. In the first few years of the twenty-first century, most of the literary journals that had flourished in the late '90s had ceased operations. What are the spaces for electronic literature and its discovery in the 21st century? How do these spaces or lack of them map and remap the field of electronic literature and its criticism? This paper considers the implications of these questions by thinking about the changing spaces for discovering and discussing electronic literature online.
(Source: Author's abstract, 2008 ELO Conference)
Serge Bouchardon's paper concludes with the observation that the field of digital literature "is based on each country's own conception of literariness, of the digital medium, as well as on the relation between the two" and completes his article with a question to be considered in future research on communities, asking if digital literature is a coherent international field or a mere collection of cultural specificities. Giving an account of how digital literature in France evolved theoretically and historically through the creation of creative works and their traditional filiations, within a study of two socio-technical devices, he also analyzes how a particular mailing list, "a reflexive device" of a community possibly contributes to the construction of the field. His contribution comes along with a rich collection of links to various French actors in the field.
(Source: Article abstract.)
Digital literature is based on each country’s own conception of literariness, of the digital medium, as well as on the relation between the two. So the following question remains open: is digital literature a coherent international field or a mere collection of cultural specificities?
In France (but this might of course be true for other countries), the domain of digital literature first built itself in a phase of hybridization on the margins of the traditional literary field, then it tended to find its own autonomy by constituting a field with its own institutions and networks of legitimization