digital cultures

By Milosz Waskiewicz, 25 May, 2021
Language
Year
Record Status
Abstract (in English)

‘In a strict sense, I don't believe there's any definition of poetry that applies to all poets. Different poets have different goals. Different poets have different things in their hearts that they’re trying to express in different ways that they want to express them. Are my videos where I'm running around in the woods talking about YOLO and dogs and dads – are these really poetry? Why call them poetry?’ 

These are the words of Steve Roggenbuck (https://www.youtube.com/user/steveroggenbuck), a twenty-something self-proclaimed video artist and poet who released YouTube videos from 2010 to 2017. Roggenbuck’s video poems comprised clips of his stream of consciousness, often filmed while he rolled in the grass or ran through natural scenes, screaming. Amongst random - and, frankly, weird - comments, Roggenbuck inserted motivational moments urging viewers to appreciate nature and follow their dreams. Many videos have been edited to include musical accompaniment, green screen-facilitated backgrounds, and/or additional graphics.

Over seven years, Roggenbuck’s fanbase grew larger and more devoted, with Roggenbuck being established as one of the alt-lit (alternative literature) movement’s most renowned contributors. In October 2018, though, Roggenbuck’s fans turned their backs to him as he confirmed allegations of sexual misconduct: allegations that followed numerous others made against alt-lit contributors.

There are, to be sure, many Internet and alt-lit poets. Roggenbuck makes for a particularly interesting case study because he embodies various facets of Internet culture: visual and aural disjointedness, conscious contempt for grammatical correctness (a poetic license, so to speak), premeditated performance of personality, and – as he has confirmed – sexual harassment brought to light in the #MeToo moment. His online persona embodies the complexities of human connection in an increasingly digital context. Rather ironically, though, most of his videos aim to ignite viewers’ passion for the natural world. ‘Worms! Worms! Worms!’ he excitedly screams as he runs through a desert in one video. ‘Fucking llamas! Llamas! Whales are so big!’

This paper introduces readers to Roggenbuck’s poetry, and explores its place within poetic traditions by highlighting the distinctive stylistic features of his work. It considers how Roggenbuck’s video poetry represents a kind of electronic literature that both reflects and parodies meme culture for young adult viewers less inclined to engage with poetry in printed form. This paper also considers how the allegations against Roggenbuck impact interpretations of his work. It aims to start a conversation about negotiating literary value and socially unacceptable authorial behavior on digital platforms with new expectations and potential issues. To use Roggenbuck’s own words: ‘I am the bard. I am the poet. And to be a poet while the Internet exists. Man, we got an opportunity.’ The ‘opportunity’ offered by the Internet allowed Roggenbuck to rise to fame. It was also his demise.

Multimedia
Remote video URL
Language
Year
Record Status
Abstract (in English)

Transcriptions is a NEH-funded curricular development and research initiative started in 1998 by the English Department at the University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) to focus on literary study and information society. The goal of Transcriptions is to demonstrate a paradigm—at once theoretical, instructional, and technical—for integrating new information media and technology within the core work of a traditional humanities discipline. Transcriptions seeks to "transcribe" between past and present understandings of what it means to be a literate, educated, and humane person.

Put in the form of a question: what is the relation between being "well-read" and "well-informed"? How, in other words, can contemporary culture sensibly create a bridge between its past norms of cultural literacy and its present sense of the immense power of information culture?

To address this question, Transcriptions has developed an integrated combination of the following:

  • curriculum 
  • research agenda
  • technology model
  • supporting resources (pedagogical, research, and technical guides)
  • special events

The idea is to build a working paradigm of a humanities department of the future that takes the information revolution to its heart as something to be seriously learned from, wrestled with, and otherwise placed in engagement with the lore of past or other societies with their own undergirding technologies and media. Transcriptions also collaborates with related digital humanities, arts, and society projects at UCSB and elsewhere. 

(Source: project webpage)

----

Transcriptions, begun in 1998, focuses on work in digital humanities and new media.  Our overall goal is “to build a working paradigm of a humanities department of the future that takes the information revolution to its heart as something to be seriously learned from, wrestled with, and otherwise placed in engagement with the lore of past or other societies with their own undergirding technologies and media.” True to the initial vision, then, Transcriptions endeavors to be flexible, responsive, and creative.

Currently, three areas of inquiry structure our activities:

  • Electronic literature beyond the screen (new reading formats; locative and mobile media; alternate reality games)
  • Media ecologies (high-tech trash; media environments’ visualizations of climate and landscape; ALife; biomedia)
  • IT and the so-called new economy (theorizations of the network society, information society, and digital capitalism)

Transcriptions will host lectures, conferences, and other events that will be of general interest to the English deparment and to colleagues across the university. Watch the Transcriptions blog for announcements and coverage of Center-related news. Please feel free to contact us with any ideas you have about our themes and activities.

(About Transcriptions webpage)