social conventions

Description (in English)

Bubbleboy project was conceived to be made from 100 posts, during 100 consecutive days. I established, in a oulipian constraint, that every post would consist of a random image, found in the images search tool,and a brief text related to it. El Diario del Niño Burbuja was made as a text in process, without any pre-established plot or direction. Fragile and insconstant, Bubble, is in a continous endangered disappearance. Like bubbles floating in a hyperspace through multiple dimensions, Bubbleboy inhabits cyberspace, a place that suggests a new spatiality, temporality without any accurate order or causal linearity.

(Written by the author, Belén Gache, published in belengache.net, translated by Maya Zalbidea)

Description (in original language)

El proyecto Bubbleboy fue concebido para ser realizado a partir de 100 posts, durante cien días consecutivos. Establecí, a manera de constraint oulipiano, que cada post constaría de una imagen al azar, encontrada en un buscador de imágenes y de un texto breve que de alguna manera se relacionara con la misma. El Diario del Niño Burbuja se constituyó como un texto a la deriva y en proceso, sin una trama o dirección preestablecida. Frágil e inconstante, Burbuja, está en continua amenaza de desaparición. Al igual que las burbujas flotan en un hiperespacio constituido por múltiples dimensiones, Bubbleboy habita el ciberespacio, lugar igualmente multidimensional que propone una nueva espacialidad y una nueva temporalidad sin órdenes lineales o causales precisos.

(Escrito por la autora, Belén Gache, publicado en belengache.net)

Description in original language
Screen shots
Image
Image
Image
Image
By Eric Dean Rasmussen, 23 March, 2012
Author
Publication Type
Language
Year
Appears in
Journal volume and issue
41
Record Status
Abstract (in English)

In this paper I look at some often-overlooked aspects of creative collaboration, drawing on my experiences in a series of group projects in which I participated over a span of almost 30 years. The infrastructural and interpersonal details of creative collaboration— the architectural space and seating arrangements, food and drink, public and private meeting spaces, meeting management, social conventions—I will argue to be important factors in the quantity and quality of the work produced. These elements are often excluded from certain types of scholarly discourse and I will make a parallel argument for the importance of their inclusion in literary history and criticism.

I use examples such as: Invisible Seattle (a literary/performance group and early e-literature pioneers), Persimmons & Myrrh (a structured show-and-tell society that included among its members David Sedaris), Chicago e-Lit Dinners (a breeding ground for e-literature projects and community), Rude Trip (a German/American collaborative literature project) and Imperial Quality Media (producers of netprov e-literature).

Adapted from a talk given at the Electronic Literature Communities Seminar in Bergen, Norway on September 21, 2010, as part of the Electronic Literature as a Model of Creativity and Innovation in Practice (ELMCIP) project.

Attachment