We live in a time of “fake news”... and not just “fake news” fake news for real people and real news about fake people, but fake news about fake news for fake people about fake people. So what does it mean to be “fake” in an age of accelerating information? The Congress of Fakery, a roundtable conversation on frauds, hoaxes, and other forms of informational flimflam by artists in the realm of electronic literature, aims to take up this question with a specific eye on its history, epistemology, practice, and possibilities for future fakery. Gaps we will address are: the real and the fake, the fake and the imaginary, the sender and receiver, differing cultures of reception, official and unofficial, and other rifts in the flow of information.Historical perspectives on fakery would include: discussions of the willing (and unwilling) suspension of disbelief in print traditions; hucksters, crackpots, and quacks; and various manufactured mass misconceptions. Epistemological discussions would include: discussions of authenticity and affect; what makes a fake really fake; and attempts to institutionalize speculative knowledge. Practical discussions would explore propaganda, psyops, and behavioral engineering as tools for the certification of knock-off knowledge.The most significant portion of this roundtable presentation would be a ranging conversation on the political and aesthetic possibilities in the area of synthetic knowledge production especially in an electronic environment. In the face of all this fakery, what can educators do to develop strategies for media literacy? What can activists do with the unstable conditions of post-factual societies? What does art add to the artificial?
hoaxes
What motivates games of make-believe—collaborative creative play—is not the overcom- ing of an unnecessary obstacle, but the resolution of unavoidable and intolerable tension. Like seismic forces in the earth’s crust, inner wars among our own sub-personalities with their conflicting motivations, as well as outer social tensions among members of social hier- archies, we find rebalancing in the earthquake of laughter. A core piece of advice from the renowned Chicago theatrical improv company Second City is: “There is a wealth of humor available through status differences and the playing thereof. Realize it and play with it. The changes and shifts that are inherent are ripe for the taking” (Libera 2004). Satirization of status and the status quo through travesty, impersonation, and formal mimicry is a long tra- dition in literature and theater. This play of mimicry, parody, and satire is vital to reveal and rebalance relationships of power. An un-satirized world is unlivable. For me the goals of each netprov are: laughter, insight, and empathy. Therefore here is my reformulation of Suits, the flag under which I play: Netprov is the voluntary attempt to heal necessary relationships.
When serious communications are made silly, the world goes cuckoo. Cuckoo birds are brood parasites. They lay their eggs in the nests of other birds. Cuckoo chicks hatch earlier and grow faster than the others, often kicking them out of the nest. We netprov players are cuckoo birds: we lay our eggs in other birds’ nests; we hijack available media for our own nefar . . . er, I mean . . . hilarious purposes. We come from a proud line of cuckoo birds. Like the London riverbank players who took the crazy tradition of court- yard morality plays and hijacked them by asking: could these become as good as the clas- sical tragedies and comedies? Let’s look at some other of our cuckoo ancestors.
Brief definition and history of digital hoaxes.