Article in an online journal

By tye042, 17 October, 2017
Publication Type
Year
Record Status
Abstract (in English)

Joseph McElroy shares field notes and reflections from Mount St. Helens.

Nearly two decades after the great eruption of May, 1980, a slow, remarkable regrowth of flora as well as a massive human involvement feed back to me old questions about the ecological order and our place in it. “A mountain bounces back,” I read; Mt. St. Helens has struggled “to be born again.” That’s not it, I think, but I am moved by the reappearance of plants and trees and animals and fish at Mt. St. Helens - the symbiotic reaching out of fungus filaments to plants roots deep beneath the volcanic ash, the herd of Roosevelt’s elk returning to feed on grass sprouting from the earth of an apparently unwelcoming ashy, silica-infused but now media-hyped “miraculous mudslide.” This blast equal to 2500 Hiroshimas the environment did, not us. But what is the environment? I search the abstracts of some of the more than 500 vineyard-laboring, exact, and specialized field studies that have provided “an excellent baseline for tracking ecosystem reassembly here.”

By Lisa Berwanger, 17 October, 2017
Author
Year
Appears in
Journal volume and issue
1999-03-15
License
CC Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike
Record Status
Abstract (in English)

Ted Pelton views Robert Creeley’s image/text collaborations in Buffalo, NY.

(Source: ebr)

By tye042, 17 October, 2017
Publication Type
Language
Year
Record Status
Abstract (in English)

Toward a definition of a postmodern genre: the field-novel.

“And the field was him,” a sentence in Plus, a novel by Joseph McElroy, warrants an inquiry into field and the novel. The novelty of McElroy’s fiction grows from the attempt to use the structure of a novel as itself a field, presenting actions which occur within fields. He displays field as aesthetic structure, and field as content of aesthetic structure. So within the novel, events which occur within a field can also be seen as themselves constituting a field. In both field as structure and as content, the hero is intelligible as a region of a field, not as a sphere or core of individuality which passes through a field in fulfillment of a destiny.

Pull Quotes

He makes a statement–“I can’t”–which he must believe to be true, but which he must hope will not be proved to be true. So the young man says, “I can’t,” and then he modifies that with the bootstrapping troubleshooter’s resolve: “But I will.” The “I will” is a promise to prove his own prior statement to be false. In a model of how we think now, the perplexity is that the narrator states two propositions which he believes, both of which cannot be true at the same moment.

By Ana Castello, 17 October, 2017
Author
Publication Type
Language
Year
Appears in
eISSN
1553-1139
License
CC Attribution
Record Status
Abstract (in English)

McKenzie Wark explores the work of Masha Tupitsyn as a pathway into the conditions of life in the 21st Century, somewhere above (or below) the framework of mediated experience, even beyond the limits of what we often call “theory.” With Tupitsyn, Wark troubles the current stasis of representation that stultifies thought in this age of unrepentantly industrialized culture, not by turning us away from the spectacle, but by smashing right through it, picking up its pieces, and discovering new things in the wreckage.

Source: Abstract

By Lisa Berwanger, 17 October, 2017
Author
Publication Type
Year
Appears in
Journal volume and issue
2004-02-22
License
CC Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike
Record Status
Abstract (in English)

Jan Baetens looks ‘through’ and ‘at’ Bolter and Gromala’s Windows and Mirrors and finds a foggy vision.

(Source: ebr)

 

 

By Lisa Berwanger, 17 October, 2017
Publication Type
Appears in
Journal volume and issue
2010-03-03
License
CC Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike
Record Status
Abstract (in English)

Marie-Laure Ryan argues that dysfunctionality in new media art is “not limited to play with inherently digital phenomena such as code and programs,” and provides a number of alternative art examples, while also arguing that dysfunctionality “could [also] promote a better understanding of the cognitive activity of reading, or of the significance of the book as a support of writing.”

(Source: ebr)

By Ana Castello, 17 October, 2017
Publication Type
Language
Year
Appears in
eISSN
1553-1139
License
CC Attribution
Record Status
Abstract (in English)

In this analytical, unabashedly philosophical engagement with Alex Galloway’s “sneakily-titled” Laruelle Against the Digital, Martin Eve sides with the skeptics for whom “Laruelle proves a better diagnostician of epistemic illness than he is prescriber of a cure.”

Source: Abstract

By Ana Castello, 17 October, 2017
Author
Publication Type
Language
Year
Appears in
eISSN
1553-1139
License
CC Attribution
Record Status
Abstract (in English)

In reviewing James McFarland’s Constellation, Donald Cross reminds readers of the rich potential of scholarly discourse. Beyond mere citations and their absence, Cross traces across the bright stars of Nietzsche and Benjamin (and Derrida) relationships worthy of serious consideration. In an age of copy/paste citations, impact reports, and optimized academics, pondering the constellations offers an opportunity to rediscover the subtle intensity of tracing forms in the void.

Source: Author's abstract

By Ana Castello, 16 October, 2017
Author
Publication Type
Language
Year
Appears in
eISSN
1553-1139
License
CC Attribution
Record Status
Abstract (in English)

In his review of Martin Paul Eve’s Pynchon and Philosophy: Wittgenstein, Foucault and Adorno, Julius Greve situates this new book on Pynchon within the upheavals produced by speculative realism and contemporary discourses on materialism. In doing so, Greve reminds us of what was always already the case: the literary-philosophical relevance of Pynchon, which turns out to be all the more inescapable in contemporary political climates.

Source: Author's abstract